Impact of recurrent pregnancy loss on depression, anxiety and fertility related stress in Omani women: A cross sectional survey.

Pregnancy is a state of happiness and hope not only for a woman but for her family as well as near and dear ones. However, this phase of happiness comes shattering down for some couple who are not able to successfully complete pregnancy and end up losing a baby in the early stages of pregnancy. Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is prevalent among Omani women and the psychosocial impact of RPL is heavy upon these young women devastating their overall quality of life. Researchers conducted a cross sectional survey among 184 Omani women who had a history of recurrent pregnancy loss in a pioneering teaching tertiary care hospital. Data collection done from using a self-reported questionnaire to assess the depression, anxiety and RPL associated stress of women with history of RPL The mean age of women with RPL was 34.05 and 81% reported 2-3 pregnancy loss. Participants reported higher mean scores of depression (9.94), Anxiety (10.32) and fertility related stress (30.28). Women with multiple pregnancy losses (above 3) reported higher level of anxiety which was significant at (p<0.05%) The findings from current study also indicated that women with RPL experience higher levels of depression, anxiety, and fertility related stress.

La grossesse est un état de bonheur et d'espoir non seulement pour une femme mais aussi pour sa famille ainsi que pour ses proches. Cependant, cette phase de bonheur s'effondre pour certains couples qui ne parviennent pas à mener à bien leur grossesse et finissent par perdre un bébé au début de la grossesse. Les fausses couches récurrentes (RPL) sont répandues chez les femmes omanaises et l'impact psychosocial de la RPL est lourd sur ces jeunes femmes, dévastant leur qualité de vie globale. Les chercheurs ont mené une enquête transversale auprès de 184 femmes omanaises ayant des antécédents de fausses couches récurrentes dans un hôpital universitaire de soins tertiaires pionnier. Collecte de données effectuée à l'aide d'un questionnaire autodéclaré pour évaluer la dépression, l'anxiété et le stress associé au RPL des femmes ayant des antécédents de RPL. L'âge moyen des femmes atteintes de RPL était de 34,05 ans et 81 % ont signalé 2 à 3 fausses couches. Les participants ont signalé des scores moyens plus élevés de dépression (9,94), d'anxiété (10,32) et de stress lié à la fertilité (30,28). Les femmes ayant subi plusieurs fausses couches (plus de 3) ont signalé un niveau d'anxiété plus élevé qui était significatif à (p<0.05%). Les résultats de l'étude actuelle ont également indiqué que les femmes atteintes de RPL connaissent des niveaux plus élevés de dépression, d'anxiété et de stress lié à la fertilité.

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Intimacy Problems, Stress Levels, and Couple Satisfaction among Women with Thrombophilia Affected by Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is one of the most challenging and difficult areas of reproductive treatment due to the immense emotional suffering inflicted on families and couples affected by RPL. As a result, it is predicted that couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss would have an increase in marital problems, stress levels, and anxiety, preventing them from achieving their family goals. The current cross-sectional study aimed to target pregnant women with thrombophilia with a history of RPL to observe their intimacy problems, stress levels, and couple satisfaction by completing a series of digital questionnaires. These patients were considered as the reference group, while the control group was formed by other women with thrombophilia and a history of RPL who eventually achieved pregnancy and gave birth. A total of 238 complete questionnaires were recorded (157 in the reference group and 81 in the control group). It was observed that women in the reference group who did not give birth had a significantly higher proportion of three or more pregnancy attempts (54.1% vs. 39.5%) and a significantly higher proportion of three more pregnancy losses (68.8% vs. 55.6%). It was observed that patients in the reference group were more likely to be emotion-oriented (42.7% vs. 27.2%). Also, women in the reference group had higher levels of dissatisfaction and lower levels of self-acceptance, pleasure, and marital quality scores. The total SII and DSCS scores were significantly lower than women with thrombophilia with a history of RPL who eventually gave birth. Women from the reference group had significantly greater intimacy problems and stress levels while having lower openness scores and self-esteem scores than women in the control group. It is possible that women with thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss are more dissatisfied with their marriages than those who subsequently had one child. Since the financial status of those who achieved pregnancy was observed to be higher, it is likely that they achieved pregnancy by ART interventions, as they reported in questionnaires. It is important to target families afflicted by thrombophilia and other reasons for infertility to ease their access to ART therapies. By achieving their objectives, affected families will minimize dissatisfaction, divorce rates, and stress.

The experiences of men following recurrent miscarriage in an Irish tertiary hospital: A qualitative analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Miscarriage is one of the most common complications of pregnancy, and recurrent miscarriage affects approximately 1% of couples. The psychological impact of early pregnancy loss on women has been well documented in the literature; however, the burden of miscarriage on men remains largely unexplored. METHODS: This qualitative research involved semi-structured interviews with five men whose partners had experienced at least two consecutive miscarriages. Participants were recruited through an early pregnancy loss clinic in a large, tertiary maternity hospital. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Recurrent miscarriage had a pronounced psychological impact on all the men interviewed, which worsened with each successive miscarriage. Three primary themes were developed from the data: (1) the deeply emotional experiences of men following recurrent miscarriage; (2) frustrations experienced during the provision of support following recurrent miscarriage; and (3) a sense of feeling unimportant. Lack of timely provision of information about miscarriage as well as lack of access to services were highlighted as deficiencies in the quality of care provided after recurrent miscarriage. CONCLUSION: The experiences of men after recurrent miscarriage are based largely on their assumed role as the protector and supporter of their partner, which often results in neglect of their own psychological needs. The support required by men is similar to that required by women, and greater access to information and services is needed to improve the experiences of men following recurrent miscarriage. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Participants were recruited through the Pregnancy Loss Clinic at Cork University Maternity Hospital and were identified by specialist midwives. Participants were approached and interviewed by one of the researchers. Participation was voluntary and the men received no financial contribution for their time.

Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend to offer supportive care during a next pregnancy to couples affected by recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). In previous research, several options for supportive care have been identified and women's preferences have been quantified. Although it is known that RPL impacts the mental health of both partners, male preferences for supportive care have hardly been explored. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in couples who visited a specialized RPL clinic in the Netherlands between November 2018 and December 2019. Both members of the couples received a questionnaire that quantified their preferences for supportive care in a next pregnancy and they were asked to complete this independently from each other. Preferences for each supportive care option were analysed on a group level (by gender) and on a couple level, by comparing preferences of both partners. RESULTS: Ninety-two questionnaires (completed by 46 couples) were analysed. The overall need for supportive care indicated on a scale from 1 to 10 was 6.8 for men and 7.9 for women (P = 0.002). Both genders preferred to regularly see the same doctor with knowledge of their obstetric history, to make a plan for the first trimester and to have frequent ultrasound examinations. A lower proportion of men preferred a doctor that shows understanding (80% of men vs. 100% of women, P = 0.004) and a doctor that informs on wellbeing (72% vs. 100%, P = ≤0.000). Fewer men preferred support from friends (48% vs. 74%, P = 0.017). Thirty-seven percent of men requested more involvement of the male partner at the outpatient clinic, compared to 70% of women (P = 0.007). In 28% of couples, partners had opposing preferences regarding peer support. CONCLUSIONS: While both women and men affected by RPL are in need of supportive care, their preferences may differ. Current supportive care services may not entirely address the needs of men. Health care professionals should focus on both partners and development of novel supportive care programs with specific attention for men should be considered.

Meditation and mindfulness reduce perceived stress in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a randomized controlled trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can participating in a tailored 7-week meditation and mindfulness programme with additional standard supportive care versus standard supportive care only reduce perceived stress for women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)? DESIGN: A two-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 12-month follow-up. In total 76 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either standard supportive care or to a 7-week meditation and mindfulness programme led by an instructor in addition to standard supportive care. RESULTS: At intervention completion (after 7 weeks), perceived stress decreased significantly both in the intervention group (P = 0.001) and in the control group (P = 0.006). The decrease in perceived stress in the intervention group was significantly larger (P = 0.027) compared with the control group. At the 12-month follow-up perceived stress was still significantly decreased in both groups compared with baseline (P < 0.0001 in the intervention group and P = 0.002 in the control group). CONCLUSION: This first RCT of a tailored meditation and mindfulness intervention for women with RPL documents that a 7-week daily at-home meditation and mindfulness programme combined with group sessions reduced perceived stress significantly more than a standard supportive care programme. Future studies should address the most effective format and the 'dose' needed for an impact on perceived stress levels.

Stress and depression among women and men who have experienced recurrent pregnancy loss: focusing on both sexes.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Are women and men suffering from recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) more affected by psychological stress and depression than the general population? DESIGN: Cross-sectional study investigating the prevalence of stress and depression in women and men with RPL seen in the Danish national RPL Unit. Data were collected between 2015-2018. All newly referred couples were asked to complete the Major Depression Index (MDI) and Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The scores of both sexes were compared with scores from relevant cohorts of men and women from the general population. RESULTS: In total, 412 women with RPL (82% response rate) and 281 male partners (60% response rate) were included. Depression: 5/281 (1.8%) of men with RPL had moderate/severe depression vs. 5/253 (2.0%) of men in the comparison group (relative risk (RR) 0.90; 95% CI 0.26-3.07, p=0.99). Among women with RPL, 34/412 (8.3%) had a moderate/severe depression vs. 2.2% in the comparison group (RR 3.74; 95% CI 2.40-5.83, p<0.001). High stress levels were found in 30/281 men with RPL (10.7%) vs. 15.8% in the comparison group (co-habiting men) (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.48-0.94, p=0.017). High stress level was found among 110/384 (28.6%) of RPL-women vs. 420/1813 (23.2%) of comparison women (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.03-1.48, p=0.026). Both MDI and PSS scores, respectively, for a woman and a man in an RPL couple were significantly correlated. CONCLUSION: Male partners in RPL couples did not have increased prevalence of stress and depression compared with other men but we confirmed our previous finding of significantly increased frequencies among women with RPL.

Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss.

Miscarriage is generally defined as the loss of a pregnancy before viability. An estimated 23 million miscarriages occur every year worldwide, translating to 44 pregnancy losses each minute. The pooled risk of miscarriage is 15·3% (95% CI 12·5-18·7%) of all recognised pregnancies. The population prevalence of women who have had one miscarriage is 10·8% (10·3-11·4%), two miscarriages is 1·9% (1·8-2·1%), and three or more miscarriages is 0·7% (0·5-0·8%). Risk factors for miscarriage include very young or older female age (younger than 20 years and older than 35 years), older male age (older than 40 years), very low or very high body-mass index, Black ethnicity, previous miscarriages, smoking, alcohol, stress, working night shifts, air pollution, and exposure to pesticides. The consequences of miscarriage are both physical, such as bleeding or infection, and psychological. Psychological consequences include increases in the risk of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicide. Miscarriage, and especially recurrent miscarriage, is also a sentinel risk marker for obstetric complications, including preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, placental abruption, and stillbirth in future pregnancies, and a predictor of longer-term health problems, such as cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism. The costs of miscarriage affect individuals, health-care systems, and society. The short-term national economic cost of miscarriage is estimated to be £471 million per year in the UK. As recurrent miscarriage is a sentinel marker for various obstetric risks in future pregnancies, women should receive care in preconception and obstetric clinics specialising in patients at high risk. As psychological morbidity is common after pregnancy loss, effective screening instruments and treatment options for mental health consequences of miscarriage need to be available. We recommend that miscarriage data are gathered and reported to facilitate comparison of rates among countries, to accelerate research, and to improve patient care and policy development.

Recurrent miscarriage: evidence to accelerate action.

Women who have had repeated miscarriages often have uncertainties about the cause, the likelihood of recurrence, the investigations they need, and the treatments that might help. Health-care policy makers and providers have uncertainties about the optimal ways to organise and provide care. For this Series paper, we have developed recommendations for practice from literature reviews, appraisal of guidelines, and a UK-wide consensus conference that was held in December, 2019. Caregivers should individualise care according to the clinical needs and preferences of women and their partners. We define a minimum set of investigations and treatments to be offered to couples who have had recurrent miscarriages, and urge health-care policy makers and providers to make them universally available. The essential investigations include measurements of lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, thyroid function, and a transvaginal pelvic ultrasound scan. The key treatments to consider are first trimester progesterone administration, levothyroxine in women with subclinical hypothyroidism, and the combination of aspirin and heparin in women with antiphospholipid antibodies. Appropriate screening and care for mental health issues and future obstetric risks, particularly preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and stillbirth, will need to be incorporated into the care pathway for couples with a history of recurrent miscarriage. We suggest health-care services structure care using a graded model in which women are offered online health-care advice and support, care in a nurse or midwifery-led clinic, and care in a medical consultant-led clinic, according to clinical needs.

Anxiety and depression are risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: a nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the interaction of depression and anxiety with the development of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: A nested case-control study involving 2558 participants was conducted with data from the prospective Miscarriage Woman Cohort study between 2017 and 2019 in the province of Gansu, China. The questionnaire data, self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale were collected after each participant's first miscarriage. Information on RPL outcomes was obtained from the medical records within the subsequent 2 years. All patients diagosed RPL were recruited as cases whilst a randomly selected group of women with only one miscarriage in the past were recruited as controls. The logistic regression and the interaction effects between anxiety and depression and RPL were analysed. RESULTS: The prevalence of anxiety (n = 325, 28.7% vs. n = 278, 19.5%) and depression symptoms (n = 550, 48.6% vs. n = 589, 41.3%) for the 1132 RPL cases were higher than 1426 non-RPL controls (P < 0.001). After adjusting for possible confounding variables, the odds ratio (OR) value, reflecting the multiplicative interaction, was 1.91 (95% CI 1.50-2.44, P < 0.001) for cases with both anxiety and depression symptoms compared with the non-RPL group. The relative excess risk of interaction value, reflecting the additive interaction between anxiety and depression to RPL was 1.15 (95% CI 0.32-4.21). Moreover, the adjusted OR for RPL cases with mild anxiety and severe depression was 2.77 (95% CI 1.07-44.14, P < 0.001), for RPL cases with severe anxiety and mild depression was 4.23 (95% CI 1.01-22.21, P < 0.001), for RPL cases with severe anxiety and moderate depression was 4.34 (95% CI 1.03-21.28, P < 0.001) and for RPL cases with severe anxiety and severe depression was 5.95 (95% CI 1.09-45.09, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Either depression or anxiety alone could increase the risk of subsequent RPL. Anxiety and depression had a synergistic effect after the first miscarriage which increased the development of subsequent RPL disease.

Perda gestacional de repetição: aspectos psíquicos e terapias comportamentais / Recurrent pregnancy loss: psychic aspects and behavioral therapies

A perda gestacional de repetição (PGR) é definida classicamente como três perdas consecutivas antes de 20 semanas de gestação. Ela afeta aproximadamente 3% dos casais que tentam conceber, quando se consideram pelo menos duas perdas, e cerca de 1%, quando acima de três perdas. A PGR está associada a diferentes fatores causais. Algumas mulheres não terão nenhuma anormalidade identificável nos protocolos investigativos atuais. O aborto pode causar doenças mentais, tais como depressão e ansiedade, e ser responsável por sentimentos como medo, raiva e culpa. Embora existam intervenções já estabelecidas para pacientes com perda gestacional com fator causal determinado, não existe nenhum tratamento comprovadamente efetivo em mulheres com perda gestacional inexplicada. O oferecimento do chamado Tender Loving Care pode levar a melhores resultados gestacionais nessas pacientes. Este artigo irá fazer uma revisão sobre os aspectos psíquicos em PGR e o cuidado suportivo que poderá ser realizado nessas pacientes.(AU)

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is classically defined as three consecutive losses before 20 weeks of gestation. It affects approximately 3% of couples who try to conceive, when considering at least two losses, and about 1%, when considering three or more. RPL is associated with different causal factors. Some women will have no identificable abnormalities in current investigative protocols. Abortion can cause mental illness, such as depression and anxiety, and be responsible for feelings like fear, anger and guilt. Although there are interventions already established for patients with pregnancy loss with a determined causal factor, there is no proven effective treatment for women with unexplained pregnancy loss. The offer of the so-called Tender Loving Care can lead to better pregnancy results in these patients. This article will review the psychic aspects of recurrent pregnancy losses and the supportive care that can be performed in these patients.(AU)

Recurrent pregnancy loss: a shared stressor---couple-orientated psychological research findings.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the psychological impact of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) on affected men and women and to determine risk and protective factors in both partners. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University-affiliated fertility center. PATIENT(S): Ninety female/male couples and 14 women. INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed a questionnaire covering psychological risk factors (ScreenIVF), experience of pregnancy losses, coping strategies, and partnership satisfaction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of psychological risk factors, perception of RPL, and coping strategies between both partners and analysis of the influence of risk and protective factors. RESULT(S): In the ScreenIVF, 47.7% of women versus 19.1% of men showed a risk for anxiety, 51.7% versus 19.1% a risk for depression, and 28.1% versus 30.7% a risk for limited social support. The use of avoiding coping styles seems to be less favorable with regard to the psychological risk than active strategies. Having a child together and a satisfying partnership correlated with a lower risk for depression. Sharing the experience of RPL with others and being in a satisfying relationship correlated with a higher social support. CONCLUSION(S): Both men and women affected by RPL show high risks for developing depression and anxiety, underlining the importance of also including the male partners. The factors of communication with others, a satisfying relationship, and already having a child together correlate with decreased psychological risks. We advocate for health care professionals to implement screening for anxiety, depression, and social support for both partners and support them in dealing with RPL. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), number DRKS00014965.

Effective support following recurrent pregnancy loss: a randomized controlled feasibility and acceptability study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is it feasible to perform a future definitive trial to determine the effectiveness of the positive reappraisal coping intervention (PRCI) in improving the psychological well-being of women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) during the early stages of a new pregnancy? DESIGN: This mixed method study aimed to establish the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) to definitively test the effects of the PRCI on the psychological well-being of women with RPL. Participants (n = 75) were recruited to the study and at the point of a positive pregnancy test, 47 were randomized into two study groups. The intervention group received the PRCI and weekly questionnaire assessment (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Weekly Record Keeping Form [WRK]) to monitor psychological well-being; the control group received the same questionnaires. Nested within the RCT was a qualitative process evaluation (QPE) exploring participants' subjective experience of study methods and the intervention. The study was conducted over a two-year period between 2014 and 2016. RESULTS: This study successfully gathered knowledge about the feasibility aspects of conducting a future multicentre definitive study to determine the effects of the PRCI on the psychological well-being of women with RPL. Participants were receptive to its use and the intervention appeared to convey benefits with no apparent downside. CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that a definitive RCT of the PRCI is possible and that the model of care already has the potential to be made more widely available as a safe, low-cost, convenient and easily deliverable intervention to provide much-needed support to a vulnerable patient population.

Attitudes toward preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy among patients with recurrent pregnancy loss in Japan.

AIM: To examine attitudes toward preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) because it has been performed worldwide in spite of little evidence regarding whether it can improve the live birth rate and prevent miscarriage. There has been no study to examine attitudes toward PGT-A in patients with RPL. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study that used a questionnaire to examine attitudes toward PGT-A, the desire for PGT-A and the factors associated with this desire in 386 patients with RPL between November 2014 and January 2019. RESULTS: Overall, 25.1% of patients desired PGT-A and 35.2% answered that they knew about it. Regarding the reasons for wanting PGT-A, 42.3% thought that it would insure a live birth and with complete case analysis, showed that the patients' wish for PGT-A as a means of giving live birth was affected by their IVF-ET history (adjusted odds ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-7.2) and whether they had any knowledge of PGT-A (2.4, 1.1-5.3). Those with a higher total family income (3.5, 1.2-10.1) and a previous IVF-ET (4.6, 2.0-10.3) tended to want PGT-A as a means of avoiding miscarriage. CONCLUSION: The majority had no opinion or a poor knowledge of PGT-A. More patients who self-assessed as knowing about PGT-A or who had undergone IVF-ET had the above type of misunderstanding. Accurate and up-to-date information from facilities different from those in which PGT-A is performed is necessary before reaching a decision on PGT-A.

Anxiety, depression and social support in pregnant women with a history of recurrent miscarriage: a cross-sectional study.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms and the associations between social support and anxiety/depressive symptoms amongst Chinese pregnant women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Guangzhou, China, between September 2016 and May 2017 with 278 Chinese pregnant women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Measures included the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS). Results: The occurrence of anxiety (SAS ≥ 50) and depressive symptoms (EPDS ≥ 13) were 45.0% and 37.0%, respectively. The women reported moderate level of social support. The low and moderate level of social support and education of high school or below were the predictors for anxiety and depressive symptoms. The other predictors for anxiety symptoms were having been married for ≥5 years and no child. Another predictor for depressive symptoms was aged ≥35 years. Anxiety predicted depressive symptoms. Conclusion: The results suggest early routine screening for anxiety and depressive symptoms amongst the Chinese pregnant women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Health-care professionals should give more effort to enhance these women's social support to decrease their anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Stress, anxiety and depression perceived by couples with recurrent miscarriage.

AIM: Recurrent miscarriage is considered a major life event. The main purposes of this study were to compare the differences in stress, anxiety, social support, sleep quality and depressive symptoms in couples experiencing recurrent miscarriage compared to peers who experience full-term normal childbirth in southern Taiwan. METHODS: Convenience sampling and snowball sampling were used respectively to recruit 78 couples with and 80 couples without recurrent miscarriage from October 2014 to July 2015. Five structured questionnaires including Perceived Stress Scale, State- Anxiety Inventory, Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Edinburgh Depression Scale were administered. RESULTS: Women who experienced recurrent miscarriage perceived significantly higher levels of stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms than their husbands. Women in the recurrent miscarriage group reported significantly greater depressive symptoms than women of the other group. A stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated key predictors of depressive symptoms among women of childbearing age, accounting for 62.9% of the variance, were anxiety, stress, social support and history of recurrent miscarriage. CONCLUSION: Women with recurrent miscarriage suffer mild to moderate depressive symptoms and a greater incidence of depression than their peers who experienced normal childbirth. Health professionals can use the knowledge gained from these findings to evaluate women with recurrent miscarriage for stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms and develop supportive interventions.

Prevalence of depression and anxiety in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and the associated risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and explore potential risk factors of depression and anxiety in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: 1138 non-pregnant women aged 20-40 years old who attempted to conceive were invited to complete a questionnaire, including basic information, Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). RESULTS: 782 RPL women, 218 women with one pregnancy loss and 138 women with no history of pregnancy loss were included in this study. We found that both RPL patients and women with one pregnancy loss had significantly higher SDS and SAS scores than the control group (P = 0.006, 0.003). Furthermore, in RPL patients, those with lower education level (lower than university), lower household income (< 10,000 yuan) and history of induced abortion had significantly higher levels of depression and anxiety. Women with multiple pregnancy losses ( ≥ 3) and no live birth had significantly higher SDS scores. Women who had been married for 3 years or more had a significantly higher SAS score. Logistic regression revealed that lower education level (lower than university) was an independent risk factor for depression (adjusted OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-2.77, P = 0.018) and anxiety (adjusted OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.04-3.13, P = 0.037), and women with three or more pregnancy losses had increased odds of depression than those with two pregnancy losses (adjusted OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.15-2.88, P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: RPL patients are more likely to develop depression and anxiety than women with no history of pregnancy loss. Lower education level and multiple pregnancy losses (≥ 3) appear to be two independent risk factors of depression and anxiety in women with RPL. Women with one pregnancy loss also show a significant higher level for depression and anxiety. Appropriate psychological intervention can be considered for such patients.

Hope for the best but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how women experience the initial period of a new pregnancy after suffering recurrent miscarriage (RM). DESIGN: A qualitative study, nested within a randomised controlled feasibility study of a coping intervention for RM, used semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic network approach. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the Recurrent Miscarriage Clinic and Early Pregnancy Unit in two tertiary referral hospitals in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 14 women with RMs and who had previously participated in the randomised controlled trial (RCT) feasibility component of the study were recruited. RESULTS: Seven organising themes emerged from the data: (1) turmoil of emotions, (2) preparing for the worst, (3) setting of personal milestones, (4) hypervigilance, (5) social isolation, (6) adoption of pragmatic approaches, (7) need for professional affirmation. CONCLUSIONS: The study established that for women with a history of RM, the waiting period of a new pregnancy is a traumatic time of great uncertainty and emotional turmoil and one in which they express a need for emotional support. Consideration should be given to the manner in which supportive care is best delivered within the constraints of current health service provision. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN43571276.

Pregnancy outcomes after recurrent pregnancy loss: a longitudinal cohort study on stress and depression.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Are self-reported symptoms of stress and depression associated with pregnancy outcomes within the first year after referral to a tertiary recurrent pregnancy loss unit? DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with online questionnaires using the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) and Cohen's Stress Scale (PSS) at referral and after 1 year. The study was conducted between 2010 and 2014. A total of 301 women who had experienced recurrent pregnancy loss completed the first questionnaire. One year after referral, 185 women (61%) completed a follow-up questionnaire. RESULTS: A score above the threshold for major depression on the MDI at referral was not a predictor for outcome in the first pregnancy after referral; OR (95% CI) for live birth 1.71 (0.66 to 4.44), neither was increasing scores on the PSS: OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.02). At follow-up, women who had achieved a pregnancy resulting in a live birth had significantly lower scores on both the MDI: 13.45 (11.05) versus 11.04 (11.07); difference -2.41 (95% CI -4.60 to -0.23); and the PSS: mean 17.69 (7.59) versus 13.03 (6.83); difference -4.66 (95% CI -6.04 to -3.28), respectively. This was not the case for women who did not have a successful pregnancy. Women who experienced recurrent pregnancy loss after a successful birth were less likely to report symptoms corresponding to major depression than women who had only experienced losses (n = 7 [5%] versus 19 [12%]; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported emotional distress did not affect future chance of live birth. A live born child decreased emotional distress.

Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples' perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up.

STUDY QUESTION: What do couples referred to or attending a recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) clinic believe they need in terms of treatment, support and follow up? SUMMARY ANSWER: Men and women wish for more information, earlier access to treatment, support and follow up that is sensitive to their history of pregnancy loss (PL), includes both members of the couple, and acknowledges the psychological impact of RPL. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous research has highlighted women's dissatisfaction with medical care provided post-PL and their desire for medical professionals to have increased awareness about PL and recognition of the psychological impact of PL. Less is known about the needs of the male partner, the needs of those experiencing RPL and whether the needs differ during different reproductive stages. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Over a 2-month period in 2017-2018, 13 couples who were referred to the national RPL program in Copenhagen, Denmark were qualitatively interviewed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Inclusion criteria were heterosexual couples with at least three consecutive PLs before 12 weeks' gestation with no children or one child prior to the PLs, not currently pregnant, and willing to be interviewed in English. Couples were interviewed together in a semi-structured format. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Invitations (n = 30) were sent to couples recently referred to the RPL program who indicated an interest in participating and 17 couples contacted the interviewer to schedule an interview. Due to cancellations, 15 interviews were held. Data from 13 interviews that met the study criteria were used for the current analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The participants had experienced a median of three PLs (range 3-6). Both men and women described the cumulative effect of RPL with an increase in pressure and exhaustion by the third and subsequent losses. Inclusion of the male partner in consultations and treatment was seen as important. Men felt pressured to remain positive and support their partners despite their own feelings of loss. The findings showed that couples desired reliable and accurate information about RPL. They wished for recognition from the medical community that RPL has a significant psychological impact, and stressed that effective treatment should include both members of the couple, with attention to both physical and psychological aspects of the RPL and should be tailored to their current reproductive stage, in order to help them cope with the negative impact of RPL and the anxiety associated with conception and another pregnancy. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Participants were self-selected thus findings cannot be generalized to all couples with RPL. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first study addressing the needs of the female and male partners in couples suffering from RPL. The findings highlight a disconnect between couples' perceived needs and their experience of medical care after RPL. This may be partly due to a discrepancy in couples' and medical professionals' perceptions of the PLs. The findings highlight that medical professionals need to take a holistic and couple-focused approach in their treatment of RPL and include attention to the psychological impact and cumulative effect of the multiple PLs on the couple. The results underscore the need for informational resources and psychological support for couples experiencing RPL, tailored to their reproductive stage. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): EK was funded by a Travel/Training Fellowship from ReproUnion, co-financed by the European Union, Interreg V ÖKS. No other competing interests were declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.